On Tuesday the 2nd of June, the pre-course will take place. The pre-course is organised for international students, and aims at improving your research skills. To master your research skills, several masterclasses are organised. In addition to that, a lecture about Your Future at the UMCG, two speed keynote lectures, and a Science Elective will be organised.
|14:30-15:00||Your Future at the UMCG|
|15:00-16:00||Speed keynote lectures:|
Patrick van Rijn PhD
Lilian Peters PhD
Johannes G.M. Burgerhof MSc
Sacha la Bastide-van Gemert MD
In 90 minutes, an overview of statistical techniques will be given. Together with the participants several questions will be answered including:
- What is the link between probability theory and statistics?
- Why is it important to use descriptive statistics?
- What is a statistical test and when do we use which test?
- How do we calculate a sample size?
Based on the article of Phung et al. (2002) on risk factors for low birth weight, we will go through several steps of the statistical process. Starting with descriptive statistics, refreshing the theory of univariate tests and confidence intervals, we will end up making and interpreting several regressions models: linear, logistic and Cox regression for survival.
Emphasis will not be on formulas and mathematics, but on understanding the logic behind the statistical tools. Depending on the interest of the participants, more time can be spend on elementary or advanced statistics.
Famelab: Can you engage your audience in three minutes?
Bart J. van de Laar MD
X-factor, The Voice, MasterChef, you name it. Talent scouting is a big thing and results in prize winning television. However, do we embrace science communication talent just as passionately as we embrace young singers and chefs? Or is science communication too important to be in the hands of young talents? On the other hand, they do shape the future of science.
FameLab is the number one international science communication contest, inviting scientists, mathematicians and engineers across the globe to take part. The FameLab contestants only have three minutes to convey a scientific concept of their choice to a professional jury. It is not allowed to use a PowerPoint or any other tool to facilitate the clarity of the presentation. All contestants are judged on the three C’s: content, clarity and charisma. An unforgettable presentation might make one the winner of a national or international FameLab competition someday. Morover, you’ll learn to master an essential skill for a PhD-student or post-doc to engage future research partners, funders and all sorts of audiences.
This hands-on masterclass challenges participants to prepare and present a three minute presentation according to the FameLab rules. The masterclass is convened by Bart van de Laar, Dutch FameLab pioneer and regular local/national convenor, together with the winners of this year’s Groningen FameLab heat.
Prof. Pieter U. Dijkstra PhD
Medical students are supposed to read an enormous amount of information in textbooks, on the internet, and in medical journals. Research is progressing fast and textbooks often contain dated information. Recent manuscripts provide up-to-date information. However, are we certain that the presented information is valid and should be implemented in patient care? Critical appraisal of a manuscript enables the assessment of the validity of the study results. In this pre-course class, participants will be provided with a general approach to critically appraise clinical research papers and assess research design, identify selection bias, information bias, and confounding factors. Different research designs will be presented, and strengths and weaknesses will be discussed. Participants will assess a paper critically. The results of the assessment will be discussed in the masterclass.
Preparing oral presentations: Capture the public and make your point
Prof. Anton J.W. Scheurink PhD
This masterclass will provide strategies for preparing interesting and engaging presentations. The essence of an effective presentation is engaging the audience, capturing their interest by posing an intriguing question, spelling out a methodology for addressing that question and then answering it. A successful presentation provides the audience with cues and information in an orderly structure, allowing them to form expectations on what they will hear and when they will hear it. Tips for doing so, along with tips on what not to do, will be supplied. The presenter will engage participants in a highly interactive format by crafting storylines and structures from material that they provide. The main focus of this masterclass will be on oral presentations but at the end we will give some do’s and don’ts on poster presentations as well.
How do scientific reviewers review your article?
Prof. J.A. Lisman PhD
After years of meticulous study design, data analysis and perfecting your article, there is only one task left; getting your article published!
How do you choose the right scientific journal for your manuscript, and what happens after the submission of your article to your journal of choice? Which features render your paper attractive to the editor and how do you increase the likelihood that your manuscript will be sent out for review? What will convince the reviewers that your work is good and how do you respond to their comments? How do you react to a rejection by the editor, would you accept it or fight for your article?
Prof. J.A. Lisman PhD will help you to find the answers of all these questions in this very interactive Masterclass.
An abstract: the invitation to your research
Prof. Marianne G. Rots PhD
The scientific abstract is one of the most important parts of a scientific paper or grant application as it presents the features of your research and with that immediately shows the quality of the paper. Your abstract can therefore be an invitation for fellow researchers to find out more about your research. This workshop is all about the writing of a convincing scientific abstract. The learning objectives are directed towards the structure of the abstract as well as towards effective and comprehensible formulation of complex problems and research constructions. The course will consist of a short lecture followed by assignments in groups and discussions.
50 shades of scientific integrity: a VIW (a Very Interactive Workshop)
Dr. Els L.M. Maeckelberghe PhD
How to make a research poster
Erik A.M. Veschuuren MD PhD
Prof. Tjip S. van der Werf MD PhD
After you have been busy with your research for months to years, it is finally finished! You now would like to share your work with the rest of the world and send your abstract to a congress. One of the ways to present your work is through a research poster.
Research posters are widely used in the academic world. Most of the congresses give presenting-participants the opportunity to present their work with a poster presentation. The research posters will summarize the research you’ve done and will help to generate a discussion about the topic.
A research poster is usually a mixture of a short text with pictures, graphs, tables, etc. During the congress, the presenter stands by the poster display while other participants of the congress can come, view the presentation and interact with the presenter.
During this interactive course you will assess a number of posters and discuss this with the other participants. You can discuss the points of improvement and you will learn how an excellent poster differs from a good poster.
You can choose your own track consisting of a combination of two masterclasses:
|Track 1||Track 2||Track 3||Track 4||Track 5||Track 6||Track 7||Track 8|
|Preparing oral presentations: Capture the public and make your point||Critical Reading||Famelab: Can you engage your audience in three minutes?||(bio)Medical Statistics||Scientific Integrity||How to make a research poster||An abstract: The invitation to your research||How do scientific journals review your article?|
|An abstract: The invitation to your research||Preparing oral presentations: Capture the public and make your point||How do scientific journals review your article?||Critical Reading||(bio)Medical Statistics||Scientific Integrity||Famelab: Can you engage your audience in three minutes?||How to make a research poster|
Your future at the UMCG
If you want to know more about PhD positions and research at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), come to Your Future at the UMCG! Prof. A.J. (Han) Moshage MD PhD, will give a detailed presentation about the possibilities of doing research and the opportunities to gain a PhD position at the UMCG. The session will be concluded with a personal story from PhD graduate Solmaz Assa.
The Science Elective will be held between the masterclasses. Besides the educational parts of the day, the Science Electives are meant to be a fun part of the day! You can choose between a patient lecture, a debate, an interactive lecture about trauma medicine and a House MD lecture.
Sonja Scholten MD
In the patient lecture, you will have the opportunity to talk to several patients who have had severe burns and they will tell about how this affected their lives.
Els L.M. Maeckelberghe MD PhD
This year, the debate will be about ethics considering euthanasia. The leading statement during this debate will be: ‘When suffering becomes unbearable: ethical dilemmas in pediatric end-of-life decision-making’. Three experts will set the stage for a thorough reflection on the ethical challenges facing us.
Patrick Nieboer MD
The topic of the interactive trauma lecture will be: ‘Dealing with dilemmas in the ER. You are the on call surgeon and disaster strikes. What choices do you make? A trauma surgeon will discuss and guide you through different dilemmas from the Emergency room.’
Marco Versluis MD PhD
During the interactive House MD lecture, Marco Versluis MD PhD will analyse an episode about gynaecology of the fascinating House MD series and discuss the myths and facts of doctor House.